CBWCENTRAL BANK WATCHEROFFICIAL COMMUNICATION MONITOR
← BACK TO LIVE WIRE
European Central BankSpeechENPDF

Macroeconomic, fiscal and financial stability in a shock-prone world

SPEAKERIsabel Schnabel

PUBLISHED14/09/2026, 09:15:00
EVENT / LOCATIONNot stated
OFFICIAL DOCUMENTPDF VIEW
OPEN IN NEW TAB ↗

This browser cannot display the PDF here. Open the official document ↗

READ EXTRACTED TEXT SEARCHABLE / ACCESSIBLE VERSION

www.ecb.europa.eu ©

ECB-CONFIDENTIAL

Macroeconomic,

fiscal and financial

stability in a shock-

prone world 1

2nd BMWE Symposium on European Competitiveness,

14 September 2026

Isabel Schnabel

Member of the Executive Board

of the ECB

Rubric

www.ecb.europa.eu

© 2

Macroeconomic, fiscal and financial stability are closely interconnected

Macro stability Fiscal stability

Financial stability

Rubric

www.ecb.europa.eu

© 3

Sources: Eurostat, ECB staff projections (September 2026) and ECB

staff calculations based on ECB-BASE model simulations.

Notes: The vertical line indicates the start of the September 2026

projection horizon.

Latest observation: Q2 2026.

GDP growth

Euro area economy has remained resilient despite large shocks

Source: Eurostat.

Latest observation: July 2026.

Unemployment rate

Sources: Eurostat, ECB staff projections (September 2026) and

ECB staff calculations based on ECB-BASE model simulations.

Notes: The vertical line indicates the start of the September 2026

projection horizon.

Latest observation: August 2026.

HICP

(year-on-year percentage change) (percentage of labour force) (year-on-year percentage change) 6

6.5 7

7.5 8

8.5 9

2018 2020 2022 2024 2026

-2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12

2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028

HICP inflation

September 2026 ECB staff projections

Milder scenario

Adverse scenario

Severe scenario

-16

-12

-8

-4 0 4 8 12 16

2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028

GDP growth

September 2026 ECB staff projections

Milder scenario

Adverse scenario

Severe scenario

Rubric

www.ecb.europa.eu

©

-1.0

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

Jan-18 Jul-19 Jan-21 Jul-22 Jan-24 Jul-25 Jan-27

Realised DFR Pre-Iran war forward curve

Latest forward curve

Median sacrifice ratios

during tightening phases 4

Decisive monetary policy brought inflation back to target without causing a recession

(ratio, sample of 24 advanced economies)

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

1970-84 1985-98 1999-07 2008-19 2020-24

Source: Forbes, K., Ha, J. and Kose, M. (2025) “ Tradeoffs over Rate Cycles: Activity, Inflation

and the Price Level”, NBER Working Paper No. 33825.

Notes: Sacrifice ratio is the absolute value of the accumulated negative output gap relative to

the reduction in headline inflation from the peak to subsequent trough for each economy over

each tightening phase (including a 12-month lag after the tightening phases ends). HP filter as

gap measure.

Realised and implied DFR

(percent per annum)

Sources: Bloomberg and ECB calculations.

Latest observation: 10 September 2026.

Rubric

www.ecb.europa.eu

©

Sound regulation allowed banks to act as shock absorbers rather than amplifiers 5

Capital ratios of banks

(percent)

Sources: Bloomberg L.P. and ECB calculations.

Notes: Tier 1 capital ratio as a percentage of risk -weighted assets, based on an unbalanced

sample of up to 76 euro area banks.

Latest observation: Q2 2026.

Euro area banks’ return on equity (RoE)

(percent)

Sources: ECB supervisory data and ECB calculations.

Notes: The sample are all SSM significant institutions.

Latest observation: Q2 2026. 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 2007 2007 2008 2008 2009 2010 2010 2011 2011 2012 2013 2013 2014 2014 2015 2015 2016 2017 2017 2018 2018 2019 2020 2020 2021 2021 2022 2022 2023 2024 2024 2025 2025 2026

Tier1 ratio (median)

Interquartile range

Subprime

crisis

Sovereign

debt crisis

COVID-19

pandemic 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16

Q1 2016 Q1 2017 Q1 2018 Q1 2019 Q1 2020 Q1 2021 Q1 2022 Q1 2023 Q1 2024 Q1 2025 Q1 2026

RoE (weighted average)

Interquartile range

COVID-19

pandemic

Rubric

www.ecb.europa.eu

© 6

Public balance sheets have absorbed shocks, while leverage declined in private sector

Source: IMF Spring 2026 Forecast.

Notes: EA includes the 21 countries of the euro area. Dashed lines indicate projection

period.

Latest observation: 2025, projection: 2031.

Public debt ratio

Sources: ECB (QSA) and ECB calculations.

Notes: Debt for firms is the sum of bank loans to firms, debt securities issued by firms and

insurance, pension and standardised guarantee schemes of firms minus intercompany

loans. Debt for households is the sum of bank loans to households and debt securities

issued by households.

Latest observation: Q1 2026.

Private debt ratio

(percent of GDP) (percent of GDP)

MAY

Please show for EA as a whole

private debt/GDP, if possible

split into corporate and HH,

since 1999 40 50 60 70 80 90

1999 2004 2009 2014 2019 2024

Debt over GDP for firms Debt to GDP for households

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%

140%

160%

1999 2003 2007 2011 2015 2019 2023 2027 2031Germany Spain France Italy EA

Projection

Rubric

www.ecb.europa.eu

© 7

Structural factors pose threat to stability and increase fiscal burden

Macro stability Fiscal stability

Financial stability

Structural factors

Rubric

www.ecb.europa.eu

© 8

Demands on public budget rise: defence, interest rates, ageing, climate change,…

Defence spending

(% of GDP)

Sources: COFOG, European Commission Spring 2026 Forecast and ECB staff calculations.

Notes: For the euro area, the dotted dark blue line represents the flexibility allowed under an activated

national escape clause (NEC), equivalent to 1.5% of GDP. This flexibility can be applied if a Member

State requests activation, based on their selected base year, and is added to the 2027 spending path

for 2028. For most of the 14 countries using the NEC, 2021 serves as the base year, while ES, BG and

GR use 2024. The dashed-dotted line assumes that all EA countries activate their NEC in 2026 and

increase spending linearly until 2028. The shaded blue area marks the projection period.

Latest observation: Preliminary 2027 data is available for all countries except IE, IT, CY, LV, LT and

MT. Data through 2025 is available for all euro area countries.

Government interest expenditures

(% of GDP)

Source: ESCB DSA based on European Commission Spring 2026 Forecast.

Notes: The figures refer to a hypothetical no fiscal policy change scenario where the structural

primary fiscal balance (i.e. excluding the cyclical impact of macroeconomic developments) remains

constant at 2025 level except for the expected change in ageing cost.

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028

Germany France Italy Spain EA

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

EA IT FR ES DE

2025 Difference 2025 - 2028

Projection

Rubric

www.ecb.europa.eu

© 9

Potential growth is slowing with structural headwinds to global competitiveness

Global export market shares

(non-energy goods volumes,

percentage point change since 2010)

Sources: CPB, TDM and ECB staff calculations.

Notes: Long-run trends in export market shares in volume terms should be interpreted with caution. Euro area

export volumes and world import volumes are not fully consistent, as each statistical office employs specific

methodologies for deflating and outlier cleaning. Methodologies may differ in terms of outlier detection,

replacement and quality adjustment. Based on this, volumes (excluding energy) series used to compute export

market shares shown are calculated by taking CPB (Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis) volumes

(in 2005 chain linked billion euros) and subtracting the share of energy exports. This share of energy exports is

based on TDM (Trade Data Monitor) values and includes HS2 sectors 25, 26, 27, 97, 98, 99.

Latest observation: 2025.

-8

-6

-4

-2 0 2 4 6

2010 2013 2016 2019 2022 2025

Euro area United States China

Potential GDP growth

in the euro area

(annual change in % and percentage point contributions)

Source: European Commission Spring 2026 Forecast.

Notes: The projections start in 2026, with a cut-off date of April 2026.

-0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030 2032 2034

Projection

Labour contribution Capital contribution

TFP contribution Potential growth

Rubric

www.ecb.europa.eu

© 10

Europe risks falling behind on innovation amid low venture capital investment

Patents by technology

(number of patent applications in 2021)

Source: OECD.

Notes: The chart reports the number of patent applications submitted to the World Intellectual

Property Organization.

Venture capital investment

(% of GDP)

Source: ECB calculations based on Pitchbook data.

Latest observation: 2025. 0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

Biotech ICT AI Green

EU US China

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

2013 2015 2017 2019 2021 2023 2025

United StatesEuro area

Rubric

www.ecb.europa.eu

© 11

Fiscal package supports growth, with impact depending on the allocation of spending

Germany: Impact of additional defence and

infrastructure spending on real GDP growth

(percentage points)

Germany: Impact of additional defence and

infrastructure spending on public debt

(percent of GDP)

Sources: Bundesbank Monthly Report – June 2026 Vol. 78 No. 6 and June 2026 Eurosystem staff macroeconomic projections (left chart), COM projections and ECB staff calculations (right chart).

Notes: Right-hand side chart is based on the European Commission’s Autumn Forecast up to 2027. Three scenarios are considered:(i ) Partial SGP compliance with investment-led package (blue:

100% productive public investment, positive impact on potential growth); (ii) partial SGP compliance with mixed composition ( yellow: 50% government consumption, lower growth impact);(iii) no

additional consolidation (red: same package composition as yellow, fiscal stance unchanged aside from the cost of the package). Under minimum SGP compliance, Germany is assumed to comply

with SGP requirements while still using the full flexibility (total allowed deviation of 0.6% GDP, national escape clause for extra +1.5% of defence spending).

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

110%

2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037

No Fiscal Adjustment - 50% Consumption share

Minimum Compliance - Investment driven package

Minimum Compliance - 50% Consumption share

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

2026 2027 2028

Defence spending Infrastructure spending

Total Total Euro area

Rubric

www.ecb.europa.eu

© 12

Debt stabilisation requires large fiscal adjustments amid shortening maturity structure

Source: Darvas, Z., Huertas, G., L. Welslau and J. Zettelmeyer (2025), “What will it take to

stabilise debt in advanced countries?”, Working Paper 28/2025, Bruegel.

Notes: SPB refers to structural primary balance.

Structural primary balance: adjustment

requirements and historical precedents

(% of GDP, percent) 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 0 1 2 3 4 5 6

Adjustment to reach SPB (% of GDP, lhs)

Relative frequency - own country (percent, rhs)

Government bill issuance

(% share of gross borrowing)

Sources: OECD (2026), Global Debt Report 2026: Sustaining Debt Market Resilience Under Growing

Pressure. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

2015-2019 2025

Rubric

www.ecb.europa.eu

© 13

European growth agenda should foster integration, innovation and sovereignty

Source: Eurostat.

Latest observation: 2025.

Intra-EU and extra-EU trade

(% of GDP)

Goods Services

0.0%

0.5%

1.0%

1.5%

2.0%

2.5%

3.0%

3.5%

4.0%

4.5%

5.0%

Adoption speed as

other GPT

Observed speed of

adoption

TFP impact of AI

(increase in % over 10 years)

Source: ECB calculations based on CES data.

Notes: The blue bars indicate the range of estimates across scenarios

reflecting different assumptions about the share of the economy exposed

to AI, which may remain constant over time (at either a low or high level)

or increase as AI capabilities improve.

Historical

adoption speed

Share of energy consumption

from renewables in EU

(in %)

Source: European Environment Agency.

Notes: The dotted line presents a linear trajectory to

the minimum EU target for renewable sources of

42.5% by 2030.

Latest observation: 2025 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55

2013 2017 2021 2025EU-27 Extra-EU 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

2013 2017 2021 2025

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

2005 2009 2013 2017 2021 2025 2029

www.ecb.europa.eu ©

Thank you very much for your attention! 14

VIEW ORIGINAL OFFICIAL SOURCE ↗OPEN OFFICIAL PDF ↗