CBWCENTRAL BANK WATCHEROFFICIAL COMMUNICATION MONITOR
← BACK TO LIVE WIRE
Reserve Bank of AustraliaSpeechEN

Fireside Chat at the Australia’s Economic Outlook

SPEAKERAustralia

PUBLISHED07/06/2024, 04:34:00
EVENT / LOCATIONNot stated

Firside Chat

Notes

  1. Fireside Chat at the Australia’s Economic Outlook Andrew Hauser Deputy Governor Australia’s Economic Outlook Sydney – 7 June 2024 Audio 18.3MB Watch video: Fireside Chat by Andrew Hauser, Deputy Governor, at the Australia’s Economic Outlook, Sydney Transcript Ross Greenwood (Sky News) Andrew Hauser, many thanks for your time. The Prime Minister earlier said that he wouldn’t tell
  2. the Reserve Bank how to conduct monetary policy. Do you care to tell the Prime Minister and the
  3. government how they should conduct fiscal policy? Andrew Hauser I had a meeting with Ross before this interview and he said he wasn’t one for a
  4. ‘gotcha’ question. Ross Greenwood No, I wasn’t, no. Andrew Hauser And that’s not a ‘gotcha’ question. Ross Greenwood No, it’s not a ‘gotcha’ question at all. Andrew Hauser Well, I’ll tell you something, actually, about commentary on fiscal policy. I was brought up in
  5. a culture where it really wasn’t for central banks to provide a running commentary on the
  6. decisions that democratically elected government’s take. Those are difficult decisions;
  7. they’re ones that they’re accountable to their electorate for. And outside of financial
  8. crisis – and unfortunately we had to deal with one in the UK quite recently – I think
  9. it’s for democratically elected governments to make fiscal decisions, and it’s for central
  10. banks to do the job that they were given to do by the public, which is to bring inflation down to the
  11. target level and to keep it there. Ross Greenwood So you might have noticed overnight that the European Central Bank cut interest rates by a quarter of
  12. one per cent? Andrew Hauser Did they? Ross Greenwood Apparently they did. That’s what I heard. And you might have also heard that the Bank of Canada
  13. cut rates by quarter of one per cent the previous night. Now, given the fact that the Reserve
  14. Bank is not ruling anything in or out, and the next rate move may be up or down, is Australia out of
  15. sequence, as an economy, as its own monetary policy, with other economies around the world? Andrew Hauser I don’t think so. Let’s take those cases in turn because they’re interesting. In
  16. Canada, the case is fairly straightforward. Their interest rates were higher than ours, their
  17. inflation rate is lower than ours, and their unemployment rate has picked up quite a bit more
  18. substantially than ours. I think if you took those data out of Canada and you plug them into the
  19. Australian context, you might well see a different policy stance. Canada is in a different place in
  20. terms of the economic development, and they made the decisions that are right for them. In Europe, which obviously I’ve been a bit closer to in recent years, there has been
  21. a very persistent lack of growth. Now, you might say Australia has lacked growth in the most recent
  22. period but, actually, if you compare the aggregate growth rate in Australia to the aggregate growth rate
  23. in continental Europe, Australia actually, as we’ve been hearing this afternoon, I guess, has had a
  24. pretty positive story to tell relative to continental Europe. You would much rather, I think, be living
  25. in Australia than you would in some parts of continental Europe at the moment. It’s interesting,
  26. though, actually, if you look at the European decision and if you looked at the detail – and I know
  27. you will have done – they actually revised up their inflation forecast for the medium term while
  28. they cut interest rates. That’s probably a bit of a communication challenge for them. And when I
  29. talk, as I do, to some of the people on the ECB Board, they’re not all sure where rates are going
  30. next. So they’ve been keen, I think, to start the rate cutting cycle to show that they’re
  31. independent of the US. But whether that goes a lot further and where it goes from here, I’m not so
  32. sure. And maybe to pre-empt your next question – but I shouldn’t do that, but I will, Ross
  33. – we all have the same fundamental challenge, which is that inflation has been sticky on the way
  34. down. In particular, services prices inflation – and I’m sure we’ll talk about this in
  35. the context of Australia – Canada and Europe, and many other countries, the UK, obviously where
  36. I’ve just come from, have the same challenge. Your colleague earlier said it was a tough time for
  37. central bankers. I don’t think people should feel too sorry for central bankers. We’re well
  38. paid, we have an interesting and important job to do. The people that are challenged and struggling are
  39. the people who are finding it difficult to make ends meet. Ross Greenwood Who are affected by your decisions. Andrew Hauser And who are affected by our decisions, but who are most importantly, Ross, affected by high
  40. inflation. Ross Greenwood Okay. So can I go back one step? The Bank of Canada, and also Christine Lagarde last night, made the
  41. observation that while in response to inflation, interest rates were raised very rapidly, you could
  42. not make the same presumption for rates coming down in the face of the now declining inflation. Do
  43. you think that is a reasonable prognosis? Andrew Hauser Sorry, for Europe or for? Ross Greenwood For Europe, for Canada, or for nations around the western world with what you describe as this sticky
  44. inflation? Andrew Hauser Well, I think you’re trying to do … your colleague was really going for it at the
  45. Prime Minister earlier – this is a mild version of that. Ross Greenwood But no, the reason I’m asking you this is, you know that interest rates are like buses coming
  46. past. You wait for a while and then not one, but two or three come past at the same time. That’s
  47. generally the way it is with interest rates. So you generally, when rates start to move either up or
  48. down, it’s a part of a cycle. Now, the question is once they begin to come down, it’s
  49. barely likely to be just one. A central bank has got to be convinced that there’s a reason to
  50. continue to move those rates down. Andrew Hauser Well, look, and this is where the uncertainty thing, I think, comes in, because if you think about
  51. where the market thought the Federal Reserve was going to be at the beginning of this year –
  52. seven rate cuts during the course of this year. What is it, one or two at most? And some people are
  53. even talking about a rate rise. So I’d be careful actually putting too much weight on these very
  54. knowledgeable forecasts at any moment in time. What we have to do is set interest rates to bring
  55. inflation down to the target. I’m sorry, we were having a conversation earlier with some of your
  56. colleagues from Amazon and Uber, and the big job there, of course, is to get the big new announcement
  57. out of the place. Success for a central banker is to be boring but predictable in these
  58. conversations, and I’m going to be boring and predictable about that fact – that our
  59. target is not a particular level of interest rates, it’s a particular level of inflation. Ross Greenwood Is it dangerous for a central banker to make predictions about interest rates and where they’ll
  60. be in the future? Andrew Hauser Yes. Ross Greenwood Is that because communication today is expected to be better by central bank Governors and by their
  61. staff? Andrew Hauser I really do believe, and I know this is a difficult thing to sell, that the most important
  62. communication we can give to, let’s be honest, the Australian people, who are the people who we
  63. all care about here, is that we can and will get inflation back to a stable and low level so that
  64. – and the Governor talked about this, I think, in her first press conference – inflation
  65. no longer needs to be part of their problem set. There are a lot of challenges in running a business. I was just up in Townsville in North
  66. Queensland only yesterday hearing about some of the challenges up there, and I was in Perth two weeks ago
  67. to try and learn about this enormous and very different economy to the one I’m used to. And, you
  68. know, you need to recruit people, you need to invest, you need to be innovating, you need to be thinking
  69. about expansions or contractions. You don’t really want to be worrying about inflation. Inflation is
  70. the thing that our job is to take off the table. The same is true if you’re a household. You’ve
  71. got lots of challenges in educating your children, bringing your family up, providing for them. Having
  72. something called inflation that you can’t control and gets into every decision is incredibly toxic.
  73. I actually think central banks, when inflation picked up a couple of years ago, forgot
  74. this for a little period of time. They forgot just how crucial inflation has played as a role in history.
  75. I mean, without wishing to be hyperbolic, it’s caused wars, it’s caused genuine breakdown in
  76. society, because it is the most unfair form of economic development that I think you can really think of
  77. as developing. If you’re on low incomes, if you’re on fixed incomes, if you’re struggling
  78. to make ends meet, inflation is a toxic thing you can’t do anything about. So it’s that, that I
  79. think we need to give people reassurance about, not that their interest rate will be at X, Y or Z. Ross Greenwood Okay. So bring it back to Australia. Here the monetary policy, the interest rate increases, were not
  80. as aggressive as other parts of the world as you’ve already observed. And now we’ve had the
  81. message that Australia will bear a higher rate of inflation over a longer period in order to try and
  82. maintain employment, because of the dual mandate now of the Reserve Bank to look after inflation and
  83. jobs. Now, those two things can run contrary to each other from time to time and maybe are now. So
  84. the question is: the glide path down for inflation, is that something that’s really been tried
  85. by many central banks before? Andrew Hauser Well, it’s interesting because when you think about where, for example, the Bank of England,
  86. which I know more about, thought inflation would get to when inflation first picked up, of course
  87. they thought it would rise very sharply and then fall very sharply. So ex-ante, as it were, ahead of
  88. the time, the central bank was pretty clear that that would be a blip. I think it was called
  89. transitory, project transitory, or some such … Ross Greenwood There were similar messages here as well. Andrew Hauser … online called about that. Clearly, that proved to be wrong, and not just in the UK but, as you
  90. say, here and elsewhere. And we’ve all had to live with the fact that inflation has been much
  91. stickier, not just in the last few months, but in the last few years. As your colleagues said at the
  92. beginning, we are living with inflation above target for years, not for months. The thing that
  93. central banks and all of us have to be particularly worried about in that context is clearly that
  94. people start to think: ‘Well, hang on, maybe these guys don’t mean it when they say they
  95. are going to target 2, 3, 2½ per cent, in our case, inflation; maybe they’re secretly
  96. targeting 3 or 4 or 5’ or ‘they’re not very competent and they’re not
  97. going to do it’. And at that point when expectations start to rise, if they do long term, they
  98. get built into wages, they get built into prices, and that becomes a very, very difficult situation. Ross Greenwood Then to get rid of it from there, what does the central bank have to do? Andrew Hauser Just to be clear, we’re not in that situation in Australia at the moment. We monitor inflation
  99. expectations and measures very closely, so do you, and so far they have been well anchored. So in
  100. terms of the strategy you describe, we have so far managed to get to the point where inflation
  101. expectations are well anchored despite the fact, as you say, we have very consciously been seeking to
  102. bring inflation back at a gradual rate to protect those employment gains. And without wishing to
  103. sound like a politician, and I have a little list of things that Australia does better than the UK,
  104. because I’m expecting this question, it’s not that little, actually, anymore. It has
  105. economic things on it, it has political stability as well. Three Prime Ministers in the last five
  106. years? Well, how about five. Ross Greenwood And none of them here yet have been likened to a lettuce. Let’s be honest about that, shall we? Andrew Hauser But on your question, we are trying something slightly different here, to some other countries … Ross Greenwood Okay. I just want to get to this point: so you believe what is being tried here in Australia right
  107. now is something different to what is conventional monetary policy theory by central banks in other
  108. parts of the world? Andrew Hauser Every country has its own objectives – to use the technical term, objective function or
  109. objective. So in the United Kingdom, our primary goal is – was/our/we/their, I’ll say
  110. ‘their’ – their primary goal is to bring inflation back to target and, subject to
  111. that, to support the government’s other goals for growth and for employment. So it’s a
  112. first priority, second priority issue. In Australia, it is a more balanced objective. That is
  113. obviously quite similar to the objective in the United States. So I don’t want to say I think
  114. that Australia is on its own. I think every central bank is seeking to bring inflation down in a way
  115. that minimises the losses to employment and to output. We have a particular weight on that strategy
  116. and, to be honest, so far that strategy has worked. It is a narrow path, but it has worked. Ross Greenwood Because I want to go to this narrow path, because traditional monetary policy from central banks
  117. would be go hard with interest rate rises, you can crunch your economy potentially into recession,
  118. unemployment rises, and eventually then the inflation comes out, you can cut interest rates. Andrew Hauser Well, I disagree with that, Ross. I don’t think that is … well, you may say
  119. ‘traditional’. Maybe that was true in the Volcker era, for example, in the US, but I think
  120. we’ve learnt since then. And most, if not all, central bank mandates include the idea that if
  121. you do the kind of thing you describe and really go macho on growth, you are going to bring inflation
  122. down, for sure, but you are going to keep bringing inflation down to zero, to negative. And we know
  123. that, actually, we talked about inflation being costly – there’s one thing more costly
  124. than inflation, and that’s sharp deflation. So your kind of strategy, if I may, the hypothetical
  125. strategy you describe, is not a sensible strategy for any central bank to do because you will bring
  126. inflation to target and then you’ll keep going. And I think that scenario, and there are other
  127. scenarios, and I see Warren Hogan is here and he has a particular view about rates, which I’m
  128. sure we could debate – he offered to come up here instead of me, actually. Ross Greenwood Yes, that’s right. He did. Andrew Hauser You didn’t take that offer. You can have different views about how aggressively you want to
  129. close the so-called output gap. Ross Greenwood So is what Australia is doing right now, the central bank, is it so different? Andrew Hauser No. Ross Greenwood You mentioned it was different, though. You mentioned it was on a different path? Andrew Hauser Well, I think, look, let me put it this way. The employment gains in Australia have been impressive;
  130. 2.7 million jobs created in the last decade. That compares to 2.5 in the UK, an economy
  131. three times as large. It is probably fair to say that there is some secret sauce here that it is
  132. worth being particularly protective of. So I would say to that extent, from growth as well, the
  133. periods of negative growth in Australia have been one, two, three, in the UK I think 12 in the
  134. past 20 years, quarters of negative growth. Those are things worth celebrating, they are things
  135. worth protecting. But no, this is not some sort of radical strategy, off the mainstream, off the
  136. grid. This is core central banking, but respected well. So I will end on this point: the objective
  137. that the Australian people have given us, the Australian Parliament, the Government, the Treasurer,
  138. that is crucial because central banks are unelected officials. Hopefully we do our job reasonably
  139. well at least some of the time, at least technically we know what we’re doing, we’re good
  140. economists, but we only act under the egis of the public. If the public choose to give us that task,
  141. we must take it seriously. If they take it away, we must take it seriously as well. So I do think it
  142. is terrifically important. Setting your own goals and saying ‘we’re going to do this,
  143. we’re going to crush the economy’, to use your example or whatever, there’s no
  144. legitimacy there. And ultimately, central banks will not continue in their role if they set their own
  145. goals. Those goals are for politicians to set on behalf of the country. Here we have a clear goal
  146. which is inflation and to protect those employment gains. Ross Greenwood Would the job of the Reserve Bank in Australia be easier right now if productivity was going forwards
  147. and not backwards? Andrew Hauser Well, there you go. There’s another one, isn’t it? That’s a hidden ‘gotcha’
  148. question. Ross Greenwood No, there’s no hidden ‘gotcha’ questions. It’s just a ‘gotcha’
  149. question. Andrew Hauser Yeah, it is. Relatively weak productivity growth is true across the western world. Ross Greenwood Yes. Andrew Hauser Even in the United States, which is an interesting counter example at the moment. Actually,
  150. productivity growth has only been strong for a quarter or two. If you look at the average growth rate
  151. over the most recent few years, it’s materially below what was – Ross Greenwood But wasn’t all this technology supposed to improve our productivity, make us wonderfully
  152. more … our output to be significant per person? What happened there? Andrew Hauser You mean AI or? Ross Greenwood All of that. It’s all coming. Everything that we’ve had so far. Andrew Hauser It’s interesting. There’s a fascinating paper that looks at when did the productivity
  153. growth really kick in when we switched from horsepower to internal combustion engines. I’m going
  154. back a little bit. Ross Greenwood A little bit. Andrew Hauser
  155. A little bit. And the truth is that what happened, first of all, was that people took engines and
  156. they just replaced the horses and factories. So when the horse used to go around and pull a bar, they
  157. put an engine in pulling around a bar. Turns out it’s not the best way to use an engine, and it
  158. actually took a generation to learn how to use that new technology effectively and get it into the
  159. productivity data. My personal view is that that was the same for these modern technologies as well,
  160. the diffusion takes longer than you think when you really have to integrate it into businesses. And
  161. so I think, look, that is a big challenge, and maybe the US has started to see that pick up, or maybe
  162. they just got lucky.
  163. I think also we’ve had some really interesting interactions with immigration, which
  164. is obviously not just true in Australia, it’s true in the US, in the UK, in continental Europe. And
  165. we had some interesting questions about the hangover from COVID, and working from home, and we could go
  166. on for hours about those various trends, couldn’t we? It’s true, isn’t it, that for
  167. economies to be on a long-term sustainable trend, we need productivity to improve. And it’s true,
  168. too, that if that’s part of the mix, it might help at the margin for wage growth to be higher
  169. without posing inflationary challenges. But those aren’t things, I think, that the central bank can
  170. directly influence. They’re things we need to understand. They are things we need to model,
  171. they’re things we need to work with government on to analyse. But productivity growth is for the
  172. economy and for governments to drive rather than the central bank. Ross Greenwood
  173. Of course. My final question really to you is – and this would have been almost the first
  174. question normally, take the mickey out of the Englishman who comes to Australia, and how wonderful is
  175. it, and how about the sport and all that type of thing .. No, that wasn’t it. I was just simply
  176. going to ask you – Andrew Hauser Didn’t you just do that? Ross Greenwood
  177. No, I didn’t. I was going to ask you about just one thing. Being here now in Australia, seeing
  178. the economy as it is versus the UK, just the settings there, where is it better to live right now, in
  179. terms of a citizen, in terms of a business? You’ve been in both, you’ve spoken to a lot of
  180. people in both places. And just why? Andrew Hauser
  181. Unfortunately, I think Sky runs in the UK, doesn’t it, so I’m probably in trouble here.
  182. I’m in the right place. The UK economy is in a very challenging position at the moment. I know
  183. that there has been a debate here about the debt stark, and the sustainability of the fiscal
  184. position. Go and look at the UK. Go and look at the US, for that matter, as well. There has been
  185. little or no growth in the UK since COVID. When you do the charts of the level of growth and the
  186. recovery post-COVID, and the big V, the UK is just tickling along at the top level it got to before
  187. COVID. Australia has surged forward on that. In terms of employment growth, as I say, jobs created
  188. here have been significantly larger. I’ve made the right trade. I’m only here for five
  189. years but I’m hugely glad to be here. And I think some of the positive stories about the medium
  190. term – I like your arrows going up. I’m not quite sure, where are they going? Which part
  191. of the world are they going? Ross Greenwood It just keeps going. That’s it. Andrew Hauser It’s like China, isn’t it? Ross Greenwood It’s like Elon Musk. Don’t worry, it just keeps going up. Andrew Hauser
  192. You might want to get the graphic designers to look at that. The opportunity here was one of the many
  193. things that attracted me to the job and as I say, we haven’t talked much about what I learned
  194. when I was out and about in the last few weeks, but it’s been really eye-opening. Some of those
  195. stories about the growth future of Australia, I don’t know if they will come about, but
  196. they’re exciting and interesting, and I’m glad to be here to learn about them. Ross Greenwood
  197. Well, a part of the new mandate for the Reserve Bank is that it communicate better with the public
  198. and with business. And in Andrew Hauser, I think you’ve just experienced that new era of
  199. communication at our central bank. Andrew Hauser, many thanks for your time.
VIEW ORIGINAL OFFICIAL SOURCE ↗